WE ARE ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE AGREEMENT: A DEEP DIVE INTO THE CYPRUS-CHEVRON NEGOTIATIONS OVER APHRODITE FIELD
In the wake of the discussions around the Aphrodite gas field, a pivotal element that has come into the limelight is the positioning of Cyprus in the negotiations with Chevron. The agreement seems to be underlined with a slew of technicalities, economic projections, and geopolitical considerations.
Backstory
In an article published on 27th October, this column had emphasized the Cypriot government's stance against Chevron's new proposition. The American energy conglomerate proposed to eliminate the use of a Floating Production Unit (FPU) for the Aphrodite field, hinting that this might result in less natural gas extraction and thereby potential financial losses for Cyprus. While this concern holds water from a governmental perspective, it's imperative to realize that this might just be the tip of the iceberg.
The Underlying Concerns
Beyond the economic ramifications, there's a more pressing concern. Technocrats from the Hydrocarbons Service in the Ministry of Energy, the Hydrocarbons Company, and the Beicip Franlab are greatly alarmed. They foresee a looming challenge – the permanent linkage of the Aphrodite field with Egypt's natural gas reception infrastructure, especially if Chevron's requested methodology is accepted. In layman's terms, if Chevron's desires are met, the entirety (or whatever can be extracted without a production unit) of the Aphrodite field's yield would be obligated to Egypt.